MMO5001 Philosophy of Science, Research Design and Methods

Contents and structure

General presentation of:

• How to design a qualitative and a quantitative research project.
• The strengts and weaknesses of qualitative and quantitative methods. Factors that undermine the credibility of the knowledge that can be generated by using different types of qualitative and quantitative methods 
• The meaning of the concepts epistemology and ontology. 
• The differnce between relativist/constructionist and objectivist empistemology, as well as materialist/realist and idealist ontology
• How all knowledge about humans, society and culture necessitates a solid understanding of idealist ontology and relativist/constuctionist epistemology 

In-depth presentation of:

• Knowledge about the relationship between philosophy of science and research design, i.e. how epistemological and ontological assumptions provide possibilities and restrictions for how specific research ought to be designed.
• Methodological challenges that arise when designing research projects based on different epistemological and ontological assumptions. 

Learning Outcome

At completion of course the student will have solid knowledge of: 

- How to design a qualitative and a quantitative  research project. 

- What the concepts ontology and epistemology refer to, and the relationships between them.

- The more important problems with different epistemological and ontological theories.

- The fundamental epistemological and ontological differences between natural and social sciences.

- The common ontological and epistemological theories employed within different types of sciences.

- How specific epistemological and ontological assumptions allow for some types of research designs and not other, i.e. allow for certain kinds of research questions and therefore necessitate certain kinds of methods.

- The difference between qualitative and quantitative methods and the different problems of relevance, validity and credibility associated with both types of methods    

 

At completion of course the student will have the following skills:

- Ability to design both a qualitative and a quantitative research project.

- Ability to analyse research based knowledge claims and evaluate their philosophical strengths and weaknesses, including methodological validity.

- Ability to independently use relevant research methods.

- Ability to design a coherent research project where epistemology, ontology, subject matter theories and methods are consistent and appropriate for answering the research question.

 

At completion of course the student will have the following general Qualifications:

- Ability to analyse all kinds of knowledge claims with regards to their philosophical status.

- Ability to critically assess the types of knowledge produced by different kinds of research.

- Ability to critically assess the validity of knowledge claims presented in scientific literature

- Ability to employ insights from philosophy of science to identify and appreciate (evaluate on all possible parameters) the weaknesses and strengths of knowledge claims.

Entry requirements

None.

Recommended previous knowledge

Basic knowledge of scientific methods as commonly acquired trough completing a bachelor thesis.

No previous knowledge in philosophy is necessary, but is an advantage.

As all of the litterature is in English, and some of it uses a relatively complicated language and terminology,  we recommend that the students have a good command of the english language.

Teaching methods

Independent studies, lectures/seminars, group work.

Compulsory learning activities

The student must attend at least 1 of 3 course sessions

The student must pass HVL's module for academic integrity (will be specified at study start).

A total of 3 mandatory assignments.

One individual assignment to be handed in before or during the first session.

Two group assignments to be handed in during or shortly after the first session. All three assignments must be approved. Dates will be specified in the semester plan.

Assessment

Portfolio with 4 separate assignments graded according to the A-F scale.

The first and second portfolios are group assignments. Students will be assigned to their groups by the lecturer.

All 4 assignments must be completed and handed in to pass the exam. The total portfolio is evaluated as one entity, meaning that individual assignments are not given individual grades.

Students who fail the exam, or who wish to improve their grade, will not be given the opportunity to redo the exam until next time the course is offered. As all the portfolio tasks are intimately connected, and may change from one year to the next, students will not have the opportunity to only redo individual portfolio assignments. 

Examination support material

All and any

More about examination support material