MACREL-OPG Master Thesis

Contents and structure

The master thesis is an independent, empirical, scientific work in which the student documents insight into and reflect on research and development work, relevant theory, and methods used for examination of the problem statement and/or area of interest. Through commiting research results within the chosen profile of master study, the student is to reflect upon the work in relation to previous research, and consider pedagogical and didactic challenges and problem areas in the research field.

The master thesis will include:

• Problem formulation and/or problem area
• Explanation of and reflections around academic and scientific theory perspectives, relevant theoretical issues and subject positioning
• Selection and justification of research design and methods in the work
• Appropriate and clear presentation and documentation of results from the analysis of empiricial material OR artistic research
• Reflection over and discussion of process and results

The master thesis must be designed in accordance with applicable rules for master theses at Western Norway University of Applied Sciences. A systematic organisation and clear presentation of the work is emphasized.

The candidate shall as a master project carry out a R&D project in the chosen profile area with or without elements of practical creative / performing activities. The practical-performing part can be artistic, performative, didactical or pedagogical. In the master project in which artistic processes are part of the candidate's activities in the course, relevant methods must be used to design a publicly available artistic work. The project can be completed as a fully individual work or as a collaboration between two candidates. The candidate's reflection on the work and its importance and relevance to aesthetic learning processes should be part of the project.

When completing a thesis 1) without an element of artistic activity, the written part should normally have a scope of 26 000-35 000 words. If two candidates work together, the written part should be a total of 45,000-57,000 words. Summary, foreword, content list, bibliography and attachments are not included.

When completing a thesis 2) with an element of artistic activity, documentation of the artistic result must be submitted together with written material which conveys the candidate's reflection on the work. The candidate selects medium and form for the submission of the work. In total, the work will amount to a total of 45 credits, where the written part will normally be 17 000-25 000 words. If two candidates work together, the written part must be a total of 35,000-45,000 words. Summary, foreword, content list, bibliography and attachments are not included. In cases where the artistic process forms a limited part of the project, the supervisor may define that the written work must be greater than outlined in point 2).

When collaborating, the master thesis work should be balanced equally between the candidates. A declaration of shared work responsibility must be attached. Collaborating candidates shall have individual oral presentations and hearings.

Learning Outcome

Knowledge

The candidate

• has specialist knowledge of the academic and scientific theory basis for their own master's work
• has broad knowledge of national and international literature concerning R&D work that can be associated with their own master's work
• understands and critically reflects on issues concerning the requirements for science and systematics associated with their own work
• has knowledge of ethical standards that must be met during preparation and implementation of research projects

Skills

The candidate

• is able to problematise and discuss research and development issues associated with their own master's work
• is able to limit such questions and implement large-scale R&D work with supervision and in line with current ethical standards for research
• is able to plan and select the appropriate strategy and methods for their own master's work and critically reflect on their own choices
• is able to document, create and communicate the work in a satisfactory manner and reflect on the relevance of the work with regard to relevant learning purposes

General competence

The candidate

• is able to implement and document large-scale R&D work in a satisfactory and relevant manner
• is able to communicate the results of large-scale R&D work in a satisfactory and relevant manner
• is able to discuss and reflect on their own choices in the R&D process and put these into a wider R&D perspective
• may be included as a participant in different R&D programmes and can critically analyse which contributions existing R&D-based knowledge may contribute to solving educational challenges in the relevant work situation

Entry requirements

In order to be allowed to submit the exam / the master's thesis, the 1st year and the scientific theory and research methods course (MaCrel-VIT) must be passed.

Recommended previous knowledge

Completed first year of the master degree and MACREL-VIT.

Teaching methods

The master's work is an independent course of study closely connected to the previous subject in the course of study and will be carried out with supervision. The candidate will be assigned a supervisor as soon as the theme of the master's work has been determined and approved. Efforts will be made to ensure that the candidate can associate their master's work with ongoing R&D work at HVL. This allows the candidate to also benefit greatly from other master's and PhD students working on different projects at the institution. Presentation of the work to other master's students is an integrated part of the study and compulsory seminars will be implemented at early and late stages of the process. An individual supervision plan will be prepared for and in collaboration with the student. The candidate is responsible for seeking supervision in accordance with the agreed plan and is responsible for the master's work.

Compulsory learning activities

Participation and presentation of ongoing master project on master seminars.

Assessment

Master Thesis (70%)

Oral Examination (30%)

The grading scale is A-F, where F means Failed.

Examination support material

All Written and printed aids

More about examination support material