This optional module is part of UPED852 Optional modules.
We survey research in the field of doctoral and postdoctoral supervision as well as scholarship on group supervision and mentoring. We debate relevant theories and findings and practice various strategies using “role play” approaches.
Key Concepts
- Criteria for “Doctorateness” in Research
- Doctoral Supervisor Competencies
- Doctoral Student Stress and Wellbeing
- Threats to Doctoral Mentoring Relationships
- Co-Supervision and Research Groups
- Supervising Postdocs
- Maintaining Professional Standards in Doctoral Committees
- Publishing and Grant-writing During and After the PhD
Organization of module
This course is an estimated 20 hours of work. There will be 8 hours of seminars (3 of which are synchronous), that will include lecturing, group discussions, and feedback. It is expected that participants use 2-3 hours reading background information and publications. Finally, it is expected that there will be roughly 8-9 hours of hands-on exercise where the participants will develop an assessment that they can use in their future work after the module is completed.
Form: In-person/digital seminars and preparation/practice in-between.
Learning platform: Canvas
Seminars
Schedule for the two synchronous seminars (offered in hybrid format, both in Kronstad, Bergen, and online/synchronous):
- 9.30-11.00 (CET) on 21 May, 2025
- 9.30-11.00 (CET) on 4 June, 2025
Learning outcomes
This module has 2 in-person seminars.
- Before the 1st seminar, the participants will be expected to read some background literature and to watch and comment on tailor-made videos for the course
- 1st seminar work in disciplinary, interdisciplinary and international groups
- Before the 2nd seminar, the participants will be expected to work on design of their mentoring plan, and share with group members and then read, comment and give feedback to each other’s work.
- 2nd seminar presentation and feedback
After completion of this module, the participants will be able to:
- Interpret and critically evaluate various publications on advanced research supervision
- Demonstrate awareness of the most common issues faced in advanced research supervision
- Design a mentoring plan for supporting various kinds of students
Evaluation
In addition to attendance, there are two main tasks
- to develop a brief mentoring plan to support various kinds of research students
- to provide feedback (written before the seminar and verbally in class) to each other on the mentoring plans.
Background literature
Breen, S. M., McCain, J., & Roksa, J. (2024). Breaking points: exploring how negative doctoral advisor relationships develop over time. Higher Education, 1-20.
Hebert, D. G. (2025). Doctoral Supervision (in Music): What the Research Shows. In D. G. Hebert & Lum, C-H. (Eds), Perspectives on Music, Education, and Diversity. New York: Springer.
Pyhältö, P., Tikkanen, L., & Anttila, H. (2024). Relationship between doctoral supervisors’ competencies, engagement in supervisory development and experienced support from research community, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 555-569, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2022.2160369
Recommended reading
Henrika Anttila, Kirsi Pyhältö & Lotta Tikkanen (2024) Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ perceptions on supervisory support and frequency of supervision – Do they match?, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61:2, 288-302, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2238673
Wendy Bastalich & Alistair McCulloch (2024) The ideal research degree supervisor ‘can play any role’: Rethinking institutional orientation and induction for commencing doctoral students, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61:3, 583-596, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2022.2158117
Aimee Haley, Mona Holmqvist & Karmen Johansson (09 Feb 2024): Supervisors’ competences from doctoral students’ perspectives – a systematic review, Educational Review, DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2024.2306938
Jalongo, M. R. (2024). Scholarly publication during doctoral candidature: obstacles, benefits, and strategies for success. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-12.
Edmond Sanganyado, Wilfred Njabulo Nunu & Surprise Sanganyado (2023) Towards a framework for embedding doctorateness in research proposals, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60:6, 930-940, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2022.2124186